<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Scary concept:  Friendly worms</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mckeay.net/2008/02/15/scary-concept-friendly-worms/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mckeay.net/2008/02/15/scary-concept-friendly-worms/</link>
	<description>The views of one man on security, privacy and anything else that catches his attention</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 23:28:31 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Robert Penz</title>
		<link>http://www.mckeay.net/2008/02/15/scary-concept-friendly-worms/#comment-1301</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Penz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 10:09:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mckeay.net/2008/02/15/scary-concept-friendly-worms/#comment-1301</guid>
		<description>Hi!

Just found that you wrote about the same topic as I did.  Take a look at my thoughts http://robert.penz.name/33/good-worms-just-a-stupid-idea/

I just put a link to your post into it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi!</p>
<p>Just found that you wrote about the same topic as I did.  Take a look at my thoughts <a href="http://robert.penz.name/33/good-worms-just-a-stupid-idea/" rel="nofollow">http://robert.penz.name/33/good-worms-just-a-stupid-idea/</a></p>
<p>I just put a link to your post into it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Penz Blog &#187; Good Worms - Just a stupid idea</title>
		<link>http://www.mckeay.net/2008/02/15/scary-concept-friendly-worms/#comment-1300</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Penz Blog &#187; Good Worms - Just a stupid idea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 10:09:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mckeay.net/2008/02/15/scary-concept-friendly-worms/#comment-1300</guid>
		<description>[...] Security podcast, which I listen to, also thinks that this is a bad idea - take also a look at his toughs.  In IT Security [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Security podcast, which I listen to, also thinks that this is a bad idea - take also a look at his toughs.  In IT Security [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Suggested Blog Reading - Monday February 18th, 2008 &#124; Andrew Hay</title>
		<link>http://www.mckeay.net/2008/02/15/scary-concept-friendly-worms/#comment-1285</link>
		<dc:creator>Suggested Blog Reading - Monday February 18th, 2008 &#124; Andrew Hay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 00:29:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mckeay.net/2008/02/15/scary-concept-friendly-worms/#comment-1285</guid>
		<description>[...] Scary concept: Friendly worms - If this ever became a reality, which I doubt it will, how long would you expect it would take before someone exploited the updating and transport mechanism to &#8220;do evil&#8221;? This isn’t a new idea, the concept of creating worms that patch your computer when you catch them. There are even some malware out there now that patches vulnerabilities on systems to make sure other worms can’t exploit the same vulnerabilities. But the problem is, if both beneficial and malign software show the same basic behavior patterns, how do you differentiate between the two? And what’s to stop the worm from being mutated once it’s started, since bad guys will be able to capture the worms and possibly subverting their programs. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Scary concept: Friendly worms - If this ever became a reality, which I doubt it will, how long would you expect it would take before someone exploited the updating and transport mechanism to &#8220;do evil&#8221;? This isn’t a new idea, the concept of creating worms that patch your computer when you catch them. There are even some malware out there now that patches vulnerabilities on systems to make sure other worms can’t exploit the same vulnerabilities. But the problem is, if both beneficial and malign software show the same basic behavior patterns, how do you differentiate between the two? And what’s to stop the worm from being mutated once it’s started, since bad guys will be able to capture the worms and possibly subverting their programs. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee</title>
		<link>http://www.mckeay.net/2008/02/15/scary-concept-friendly-worms/#comment-1271</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2008 05:41:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mckeay.net/2008/02/15/scary-concept-friendly-worms/#comment-1271</guid>
		<description>If this ever comes to pass, I can see a lot of high-interaction honeypot owners being pretty upset :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If this ever comes to pass, I can see a lot of high-interaction honeypot owners being pretty upset <img src='http://mckeay.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin</title>
		<link>http://www.mckeay.net/2008/02/15/scary-concept-friendly-worms/#comment-1268</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2008 00:16:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mckeay.net/2008/02/15/scary-concept-friendly-worms/#comment-1268</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the link.  I knew I'd read a paper on this before I just hadn't realized how long ago it was.  Maybe the new MS paper will bring something new to light but I somehow doubt it.

Martin</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the link.  I knew I&#8217;d read a paper on this before I just hadn&#8217;t realized how long ago it was.  Maybe the new MS paper will bring something new to light but I somehow doubt it.</p>
<p>Martin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kurt wismer</title>
		<link>http://www.mckeay.net/2008/02/15/scary-concept-friendly-worms/#comment-1264</link>
		<dc:creator>kurt wismer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 21:39:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mckeay.net/2008/02/15/scary-concept-friendly-worms/#comment-1264</guid>
		<description>vesselin bontchev's paper "are good viruses still a bad idea" (http://www.people.frisk-software.com/~bontchev/papers/goodvir.html) is pretty much the final word on this topic and has been for more than a decade... microsoft is clearly too big for the right hand to know what the left hand is doing, otherwise some of the very bright people working on their anti-malware offering (who i *know* know this stuff) would have put an end to this train of thought before this embarrassing publication...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>vesselin bontchev&#8217;s paper &#8220;are good viruses still a bad idea&#8221; (http://www.people.frisk-software.com/~bontchev/papers/goodvir.html) is pretty much the final word on this topic and has been for more than a decade&#8230; microsoft is clearly too big for the right hand to know what the left hand is doing, otherwise some of the very bright people working on their anti-malware offering (who i *know* know this stuff) would have put an end to this train of thought before this embarrassing publication&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
