Feb
07
2008
Now that the total of cables cut or disabled in the Middle East has risen to five, there’s even more conspiracy theories coming out of the woodwork. And it’s no wonder; if 50 of these happen a year worldwide, to have five happen within a week in a geographically limited area is a statistical anomaly to say the least. I’m betting that this is just a what it appears to be on the surface, a series of unrelated failures that just happened in a short period of time. But it is fun to speculate and try assigning human interference to the problem rather than natural events.
If this is a conspiracy, then the target isn’t the cables that have been cut. Think about it, what conspiracy would do something as direct and overt as cutting these cables? No, the real target would be re-routing the traffic over cables and networks the conspirators already controlled before any of this started. Or they’re trying to distract all the conspiracy buffs from something even bigger happening elsewhere. Whatever they’re doing, the loss of these cables and the disruption to Internet traffic in the Middle East and India is a side effect, not the real target.
Conspiracy theory is attractive because it pulls in so many threads of truth and weaves them together in a believable story. It’s the sort of speculation and half understood facts that fuel the Internet and the Blogosphere to begin with, so events like this are going to bring out anyone and everyone with an ax to grind with a government agency or secret society. Even if, or maybe especially if, the official reports say that these were all natural occurrences, conspiracy theories are going to continue. After all, every once and a while a real conspiracy proves to exist.
If you think the Internet’s abuzz now, just wait until cable #6 goes.
Feb
01
2008
I’ll be the first to admit I joined Twitter and Facebook thanks to social pressures from Jeremiah Owyang. I figure that when you’ve got a friend who’s a social media guru, you should listen to his advice once in a while. I’ve regretted signing up for both some, Facebook because of the privacy issues, especially Beacon, and Twitter because it is such a time and attention hog if you let it. Both are great social networking tools and have helped me get in contact with other security professionals and fans of the blog/podcast. If you keep in mind that everything you put on either of these tools can be read by your boss or potential boss, that is.
That being said, I’m still not a big user of either tool, though I monitor Twitter via
Twhirl most days. I respond to invites in both tools and will usually follow people who are following me if they sound interesting, but I rarely go looking to add more friends. I look at Facebook as a good way to get in touch with listeners, while I find twitter to be a good way to keep up with events happening with my friends and colleagues. I also find twitter to be a good way to waste much of my day as I respond to fellow twitterers (?) and read the articles everyone posts about.
On the other end of the spectrum in the security community is someone like Jennifer aka Mediaphyter. Jennifer has gone out of her way to find as many security professionals who are using Twitter as possible and named us the “Security Twits“. I don’t like the name myself, partly because it sounds like an insult, partly because it makes me feel like we should be on a podcast with Leo Laporte and Steve Gibson. Leo’s a great guy, but sometimes Steve makes me feel like he missed his meds first thing in the morning. Not that I’d turn down a chance to be on their show, of course.
If you’re a twitter user and want to follow a bunch of security professionals, you need to take a look at Jennifer’s list. I’ve already found more than a few people I’ll be adding to my own list. I have this funny feeling that the list might get hijacked by a reporter somewhere and listed as the “most influential people in security” in the not too distant future. At least Amrit’s not at the top of the list this time!
Technorati Tags: security, twitter, social networking