<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A little judicial oversight please</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mckeay.net/2008/04/22/a-little-judicial-oversight-please/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mckeay.net/2008/04/22/a-little-judicial-oversight-please/</link>
	<description>The views of one man on security, privacy and anything else that catches his attention.  The views expressed on this blog do not reflect the views of my employer or anyone other than myself.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 21:45:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Interesting Bits - April 23rd, 2008 &#171; Infosec Ramblings</title>
		<link>http://www.mckeay.net/2008/04/22/a-little-judicial-oversight-please/comment-page-1/#comment-1697</link>
		<dc:creator>Interesting Bits - April 23rd, 2008 &#171; Infosec Ramblings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 14:41:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mckeay.net/2008/04/22/a-little-judicial-oversight-please/#comment-1697</guid>
		<description>[...] A little judicial oversight please - Martin McKeay has a good post about privacy and the need for enforcement agencies to have access to information, but with appropriate judicial oversight. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] A little judicial oversight please &#8211; Martin McKeay has a good post about privacy and the need for enforcement agencies to have access to information, but with appropriate judicial oversight. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.mckeay.net/2008/04/22/a-little-judicial-oversight-please/comment-page-1/#comment-1689</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 10:03:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mckeay.net/2008/04/22/a-little-judicial-oversight-please/#comment-1689</guid>
		<description>Its a scary society which allows the police (in all aspects from local cops to NSA) to collect data and use intrusive surveliace without even a warrant. 

On a related note - I&#039;ve just read an interesting but rather academic paper on privacy that you might like. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=998565

I should blog a comment about it really - but you may find it interesting. What shocked me was the difference in privacy between my country (NZ) and yours. The thought that banks can sell data and be found to have not harmed their clients, and secondary use of data ... that&#039;s just shocking to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its a scary society which allows the police (in all aspects from local cops to NSA) to collect data and use intrusive surveliace without even a warrant. </p>
<p>On a related note &#8211; I&#8217;ve just read an interesting but rather academic paper on privacy that you might like. <a href="http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=998565" rel="nofollow">http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=998565</a></p>
<p>I should blog a comment about it really &#8211; but you may find it interesting. What shocked me was the difference in privacy between my country (NZ) and yours. The thought that banks can sell data and be found to have not harmed their clients, and secondary use of data &#8230; that&#8217;s just shocking to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

