<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Last call for WAF and Code Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mckeay.net/2008/06/30/last-call-for-waf-and-code-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mckeay.net/2008/06/30/last-call-for-waf-and-code-review/</link>
	<description>The views of one man on security, privacy and anything else that catches his attention</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 21:32:55 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.mckeay.net/2008/06/30/last-call-for-waf-and-code-review/#comment-2497</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 18:29:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mckeay.net/2008/06/30/last-call-for-waf-and-code-review/#comment-2497</guid>
		<description>True that the validation aspect of PCI compliance requires that companies adhere to Requirement 6.6 (as of July 1, 2008), but has the bar really been raised?  I mean people still need to secure their networks and at the end of the day this requirement is just meant to hedge a known attack vector that has emerged in the past few years ahead of others.

Companies must stay one step ahead of the hacker. If they do, compliance is a simple exercise left to the reader.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>True that the validation aspect of PCI compliance requires that companies adhere to Requirement 6.6 (as of July 1, 2008), but has the bar really been raised?  I mean people still need to secure their networks and at the end of the day this requirement is just meant to hedge a known attack vector that has emerged in the past few years ahead of others.</p>
<p>Companies must stay one step ahead of the hacker. If they do, compliance is a simple exercise left to the reader.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
