<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why no one person should control it all</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mckeay.net/2008/07/16/why-no-one-person-should-control-it-all/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mckeay.net/2008/07/16/why-no-one-person-should-control-it-all/</link>
	<description>The views of one man on security, privacy and anything else that catches his attention.  The views expressed on this blog do not reflect the views of my employer or anyone other than myself.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 21:45:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Lewis</title>
		<link>http://www.mckeay.net/2008/07/16/why-no-one-person-should-control-it-all/comment-page-1/#comment-3039</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Lewis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 14:32:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mckeay.net/2008/07/16/why-no-one-person-should-control-it-all/#comment-3039</guid>
		<description>As Andrew Jacquith says in his book, Security Metrics: &quot;Trust is good. Control is better&quot;.

Dual key controls go along way to preventing this kind of thing. So does tamper-proof audit trails based on user roles. This is not the first time an individual has held an enterpise  hostage. Is it really a safe option not to assume the possibility of evil administratrors?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As Andrew Jacquith says in his book, Security Metrics: &#8220;Trust is good. Control is better&#8221;.</p>
<p>Dual key controls go along way to preventing this kind of thing. So does tamper-proof audit trails based on user roles. This is not the first time an individual has held an enterpise  hostage. Is it really a safe option not to assume the possibility of evil administratrors?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don Clifton</title>
		<link>http://www.mckeay.net/2008/07/16/why-no-one-person-should-control-it-all/comment-page-1/#comment-2964</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Clifton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 21:46:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mckeay.net/2008/07/16/why-no-one-person-should-control-it-all/#comment-2964</guid>
		<description>Scott:

 I would say more to a point of taking drive images and having a forensics expert looking into it and hopefully mapping his actions to when these issues started. Very strange story though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scott:</p>
<p> I would say more to a point of taking drive images and having a forensics expert looking into it and hopefully mapping his actions to when these issues started. Very strange story though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Morrison</title>
		<link>http://www.mckeay.net/2008/07/16/why-no-one-person-should-control-it-all/comment-page-1/#comment-2962</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Morrison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 18:04:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mckeay.net/2008/07/16/why-no-one-person-should-control-it-all/#comment-2962</guid>
		<description>While I wouldn&#039;t want to speculate on whether or not Childs has implemented a data bomb, I question the utility of a physical remote control device, not to mention any sort of remote control that would be obvious to police or security teams searching his apartment.

A databomb is more likely to be on a watchdog timer, a logical deadman&#039;s switch, or triggered via network access or other predetermined network conditions. If they don&#039;t have access to the involved systems, they&#039;re not likely to find such a bomb, or determine the triggering method.

There&#039;s an issue with the &quot;let &#039;em nuke it and restore from backup&quot; option, too. If there is a databomb, how long ago did our dear antagonist place it? How long ago was the latest clean backup? Restoring from a backup set that&#039;s recent enough to have useful data might simply be restoring the logic bomb, too.

The whole thing has been compromised, and needs a top down review by security professionals, along with clean rebuilds and data-only restores.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I wouldn&#8217;t want to speculate on whether or not Childs has implemented a data bomb, I question the utility of a physical remote control device, not to mention any sort of remote control that would be obvious to police or security teams searching his apartment.</p>
<p>A databomb is more likely to be on a watchdog timer, a logical deadman&#8217;s switch, or triggered via network access or other predetermined network conditions. If they don&#8217;t have access to the involved systems, they&#8217;re not likely to find such a bomb, or determine the triggering method.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s an issue with the &#8220;let &#8216;em nuke it and restore from backup&#8221; option, too. If there is a databomb, how long ago did our dear antagonist place it? How long ago was the latest clean backup? Restoring from a backup set that&#8217;s recent enough to have useful data might simply be restoring the logic bomb, too.</p>
<p>The whole thing has been compromised, and needs a top down review by security professionals, along with clean rebuilds and data-only restores.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

