<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Yes, AT&amp;T, we mean you!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mckeay.net/2008/07/24/yes-att-we-mean-you/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mckeay.net/2008/07/24/yes-att-we-mean-you/</link>
	<description>The views of one man on security, privacy and anything else that catches his attention.  The views expressed on this blog do not reflect the views of my employer or anyone other than myself.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 21:45:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Network Security Blog &#187; Oh oh, I use AT&#38;T</title>
		<link>http://www.mckeay.net/2008/07/24/yes-att-we-mean-you/comment-page-1/#comment-3054</link>
		<dc:creator>Network Security Blog &#187; Oh oh, I use AT&#38;T</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 21:57:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mckeay.net/?p=1554#comment-3054</guid>
		<description>[...] by Dan Kaminsky. I&#8217;ve been testing my internet connection every once in a while since I called out AT&amp;T to patch last week and as of Monday it appeared to be safe. Even the 3G connection I&#8217;m using right now appears [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] by Dan Kaminsky. I&#8217;ve been testing my internet connection every once in a while since I called out AT&amp;T to patch last week and as of Monday it appeared to be safe. Even the 3G connection I&#8217;m using right now appears [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Network Security Blog &#187; Oh oh, I use AT&#38;T</title>
		<link>http://www.mckeay.net/2008/07/24/yes-att-we-mean-you/comment-page-1/#comment-3055</link>
		<dc:creator>Network Security Blog &#187; Oh oh, I use AT&#38;T</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 21:57:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mckeay.net/?p=1554#comment-3055</guid>
		<description>[...] by Dan Kaminsky. I&#8217;ve been testing my internet connection every once in a while since I called out AT&amp;T to patch last week and as of Monday it appeared to be safe. Even the 3G connection I&#8217;m using right now appears [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] by Dan Kaminsky. I&#8217;ve been testing my internet connection every once in a while since I called out AT&amp;T to patch last week and as of Monday it appeared to be safe. Even the 3G connection I&#8217;m using right now appears [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael R. Farnum</title>
		<link>http://www.mckeay.net/2008/07/24/yes-att-we-mean-you/comment-page-1/#comment-3013</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael R. Farnum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 20:41:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mckeay.net/?p=1554#comment-3013</guid>
		<description>Same here.  I use AT&amp;T broadband at the house, and Dan&#039;s script still shows them to be unpatched.  Switching the house DHCP to OpenDNS servers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Same here.  I use AT&amp;T broadband at the house, and Dan&#8217;s script still shows them to be unpatched.  Switching the house DHCP to OpenDNS servers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shane Castle</title>
		<link>http://www.mckeay.net/2008/07/24/yes-att-we-mean-you/comment-page-1/#comment-3012</link>
		<dc:creator>Shane Castle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 18:24:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mckeay.net/?p=1554#comment-3012</guid>
		<description>The IP shown there seems to be a DNS server:

$ dig +short -x 209.183.33.23
schinetdns.mycingular.net.

I can&#039;t get the PIE on my WM6 device to run Dan&#039;s checking script, so I can&#039;t supply another data point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The IP shown there seems to be a DNS server:</p>
<p>$ dig +short -x 209.183.33.23<br />
schinetdns.mycingular.net.</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t get the PIE on my WM6 device to run Dan&#8217;s checking script, so I can&#8217;t supply another data point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Willingham</title>
		<link>http://www.mckeay.net/2008/07/24/yes-att-we-mean-you/comment-page-1/#comment-3010</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Willingham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 16:16:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mckeay.net/?p=1554#comment-3010</guid>
		<description>The servers they use for DSL (at least in Atlanta) are still showing as unpatched.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The servers they use for DSL (at least in Atlanta) are still showing as unpatched.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

