<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: RIAA&#8217;s only win now a mistrial</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mckeay.net/2008/09/25/riaas-only-win-now-a-mistrial/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mckeay.net/2008/09/25/riaas-only-win-now-a-mistrial/</link>
	<description>The views of one man on security, privacy and anything else that catches his attention.  The views expressed on this blog do not reflect the views of my employer or anyone other than myself.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 21:45:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Webster</title>
		<link>http://www.mckeay.net/2008/09/25/riaas-only-win-now-a-mistrial/comment-page-1/#comment-3499</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Webster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2008 05:04:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mckeay.net/2008/09/25/riaas-only-win-now-a-mistrial/#comment-3499</guid>
		<description>Sadly, the bill that the DoJ (with the help of Sen. Ron Wyden, D-Ore.) dodged the enforcement bullet on was passed unanimously by the Senate (see http://news.cnet.com/8301-13578_3-10052271-38.html?part=rss&amp;subj=news&amp;tag=2547-1_3-0-20). Like you, any bill that is praised by the RIAA makes me queasy.

&quot;At a critical economic juncture, this bipartisan legislation provides enhanced protection for an important asset that helps lead our global competitiveness,&quot; RIAA Chairman and CEO Mitch Bainwol said. &quot;Additional tools for intellectual-property enforcement are not just good for the copyright community but for consumers who will enjoy a wider array of legitimate offerings.&quot; 

Even though the DoJ enforcement teeth were largely removed, &quot;The legislation still provides increased resources for the Justice Department to combat intellectual property theft and provide coordination for federal and state efforts against counterfeiting and piracy. It also increases penalties for intellectual property infringements.&quot;

In addition &quot;The bill replaces the body that currently enforces intellectual property law with a White House Intellectual Property Enforcement Coordinator.&quot; Which even the Bush administration finds &quot;objectionable on constitutional grounds.&quot;

And when the Bush administration finds anything &quot;objectionable on constitutional grounds&quot; it must be off-the-charts bad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sadly, the bill that the DoJ (with the help of Sen. Ron Wyden, D-Ore.) dodged the enforcement bullet on was passed unanimously by the Senate (see <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-13578_3-10052271-38.html?part=rss&#038;subj=news&#038;tag=2547-1_3-0-20" rel="nofollow">http://news.cnet.com/8301-13578_3-10052271-38.html?part=rss&#038;subj=news&#038;tag=2547-1_3-0-20</a>). Like you, any bill that is praised by the RIAA makes me queasy.</p>
<p>&#8220;At a critical economic juncture, this bipartisan legislation provides enhanced protection for an important asset that helps lead our global competitiveness,&#8221; RIAA Chairman and CEO Mitch Bainwol said. &#8220;Additional tools for intellectual-property enforcement are not just good for the copyright community but for consumers who will enjoy a wider array of legitimate offerings.&#8221; </p>
<p>Even though the DoJ enforcement teeth were largely removed, &#8220;The legislation still provides increased resources for the Justice Department to combat intellectual property theft and provide coordination for federal and state efforts against counterfeiting and piracy. It also increases penalties for intellectual property infringements.&#8221;</p>
<p>In addition &#8220;The bill replaces the body that currently enforces intellectual property law with a White House Intellectual Property Enforcement Coordinator.&#8221; Which even the Bush administration finds &#8220;objectionable on constitutional grounds.&#8221;</p>
<p>And when the Bush administration finds anything &#8220;objectionable on constitutional grounds&#8221; it must be off-the-charts bad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

