<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Be compliant through security</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mckeay.net/2008/09/29/be-compliant-through-security/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mckeay.net/2008/09/29/be-compliant-through-security/</link>
	<description>The views of one man on security, privacy and anything else that catches his attention.  The views expressed on this blog do not reflect the views of my employer or anyone other than myself.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 21:45:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Security versus compliance &#171; VPN Haus</title>
		<link>http://www.mckeay.net/2008/09/29/be-compliant-through-security/comment-page-1/#comment-3650</link>
		<dc:creator>Security versus compliance &#171; VPN Haus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 21:53:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mckeay.net/2008/09/29/be-compliant-through-security/#comment-3650</guid>
		<description>[...] Especially of interest is Section 4, which calls for the Commonwealth&#8217;s CIO to oversee the guidelines, plans, reporting and auditing of each agency. The order calls, in particular, for a lot of auditing. This brings to mind Martin McKeay&#8217;s excellent discussion of compliance through security. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Especially of interest is Section 4, which calls for the Commonwealth&#8217;s CIO to oversee the guidelines, plans, reporting and auditing of each agency. The order calls, in particular, for a lot of auditing. This brings to mind Martin McKeay&#8217;s excellent discussion of compliance through security. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What we&#8217;re reading, week of 9/29 &#171; VPN Haus</title>
		<link>http://www.mckeay.net/2008/09/29/be-compliant-through-security/comment-page-1/#comment-3506</link>
		<dc:creator>What we&#8217;re reading, week of 9/29 &#171; VPN Haus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 20:15:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mckeay.net/2008/09/29/be-compliant-through-security/#comment-3506</guid>
		<description>[...] info  By vpnhaus   Categories: Highlights                     From Network Security Blog&#8230; Be compliant through security Martin McKeay suggests that it is possible to be compliant and yet still insecure, and points us to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] info  By vpnhaus   Categories: Highlights                     From Network Security Blog&#8230; Be compliant through security Martin McKeay suggests that it is possible to be compliant and yet still insecure, and points us to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

