Jul
16
2007
I use Gmail as my central email repository and usually the spam filters they use are pretty good. But lately they’ve been a little overly aggressive, so I have to comb through to make sure no legitimate email is being caught accidentally. There’s not a lot that’s misidentified, but there’s enough to make it worth the few minutes a day it takes to double-check the spam folder.
I’ve been amazed at some of the subject lines I see, as well as what I see in the preview of the email. There’s no way I’m going to click on any of them to find out what else is in the spam, because it’s just not worth the risk. But I do have to say that my favorite subject line so far is “Thanks for contributing to our financial success”. It’s honest and straight forward even if it is just an attempt to rip off people around the globe.
On a side note, I used to clean out my spam folder every couple of days, but in March I started letting them accumulate and get deleted automatically when they’ve aged 30 days. It’s been interesting watching the number of spams spike and drop. At one point I had gathered nearly 9000 spams in a 30 day period, which works out to an average of 300 spams a day. Personally, that means about 60% of my email is spam, a far lower percentage of spam than most people see. I guess being subscribed to ten or so mailing lists had to have some benefit.
Mine is just a single data point, compared to the millions some anti-spam vendors get to see. But I like having a personal high water mark to compare to what the vendors are reporting. I’m not a spam expert, so it’s interesting to see new spam subjects that companies like F-secure report. Anyone else out there keep track of the spam they receive for fun?
Technorati Tags: security, spam, McKeay
Jan
21
2007
The trip to Sacramento was a great success for the family and me. I was a little worried that bringing the family to one of Robert Scoble’s photowalks might not be kosher, but I needn’t have worried. Thomas Hawk had his kids there and there was a trio of cute little redheads running around with my boys. Plus a train museum is really a great place to let kids run around. There were a lot of interesting people and I got to meet a reader/listener who is a blogger in his own right, Garrett Gee. I’m still trying to get my head around the fact that people will occasionally recognize my voice from the podcast.
As the title of this entry indicates, I didn’t get very many good pictures. I started off using the flash, but decided there was enough ambient light that I could switch off the flash and use an ISO of 1600. I barely know what that means, so I didn’t know that it would make most of my pictures incredibly grainy. At least I knew enough to make sure I was stablized before taking a picture. You can take a look at the few pictures I thought were decent, a couple of which my wife took with our other digital camera. By the way, not having to share a resource like a camera is one of my secrets to a happy marriage.
I found one thing while preparing the photos that is directly security related: Flickr is another system that is being attacked by phishers and other malcontents. They have an alert that’s part of the home page which leads to a short but clear statement explaining what’s happening, along with a number of links to explain the security issues for their customers. It appears that the target is to install trojans on users systems, not the photo’s themselves. It’s dated the 19th, so this may be a new occurance, but I doubt it.
I’m planning on attending the next photowalk if possible. I learned not to use an ISO of 1600, at the very least.
Technorati Tags: security, mckeay, Robert Scoble, Thomas Hawk, photowalk
Jun
09
2006
What an evil, sneaky, underhanded way to social engineer a business! I like it! This company took twenty USB thumb drives, seeded them liberally with malware and pictures, and left them on the ground outside the credit union they were targeting. People fell for it, and quite frankly I can’t say I blame them. If I found a thumb drive laying around in the parking lot, I’d probably plug it into a system to see who it belonged to myself. Or at least I would have before I read this article.
This was done as part of a penatration test, with the full approval of the company that was attacked. But is it really safe for anyone to assume that the any media you find laying around was lost, not placed there on purpose? This really would be a good way to target almost any company you might want to mention. It’s so much safer to always assume a malicious intent and take the proper precautions than it is to assume innocence. This is why I always get so angry when businesses talk about stolen laptops and the thieves not knowing what they have. You have to assume malicious intent and prove that none exists, not the other way around.
Technorati Tags: security, USB drive, social engineering