Jul
07
2008
I upgraded my secondary computers, the Mac Book Pro and the wife’s desktop, to Firefox 3 the day it came out last month, but I put off upgrading my primary system until this weekend. Why? Because I dislike a number of the default tab behaviors Firefox displays by default; they’re fine for lite browsing, but for my more serious browsing, it got to be annoying. Trying to organize show notes and organize articles for blog posts is just easier when tabs behave the way I want them too, not the way Mozilla wants them to. So I waited for Tab Mix Plus to catch up with Firefox 3. Which they’ve done, even though it’s still a ‘development’ version.
There are a few features that TMP offers that I really need. The first is opening up URL’s I type in in a new tab rather than in the current window by default. There’s probably a way to get FF3 to exhibit this behavior without TMP, but I’ve never been able to work right. Another feature is the ability to automatically reload a particular tab on a regular basis. I have a couple of stats windows I keep open that I want to reload every 15 minutes, like my blog stat and podcast stat pages. Neither of these features is absolutely necessary, but it makes my browsing experience more enjoyable.
Now to upgrade the kids computer and the other household laptop. It’s a bit scary that we’ve got more computers than people in our household. But I guess that’s part of what happens when you’re a computer geek.
Apr
09
2008
NSS Labs is an independent testing lab that certifies firewalls, UTM’s and a host of other products for compliance with programs such as PCI. I had a chance to talk to Rick Moy for a few minutes and talk about the proper use of these reports.
nsp-RSA2008-RickMoy.mp3

Standard Podcast [4:23m]:
Play Now |
Play in Popup |
Download
Jul
16
2007
I use Gmail as my central email repository and usually the spam filters they use are pretty good. But lately they’ve been a little overly aggressive, so I have to comb through to make sure no legitimate email is being caught accidentally. There’s not a lot that’s misidentified, but there’s enough to make it worth the few minutes a day it takes to double-check the spam folder.
I’ve been amazed at some of the subject lines I see, as well as what I see in the preview of the email. There’s no way I’m going to click on any of them to find out what else is in the spam, because it’s just not worth the risk. But I do have to say that my favorite subject line so far is “Thanks for contributing to our financial success”. It’s honest and straight forward even if it is just an attempt to rip off people around the globe.
On a side note, I used to clean out my spam folder every couple of days, but in March I started letting them accumulate and get deleted automatically when they’ve aged 30 days. It’s been interesting watching the number of spams spike and drop. At one point I had gathered nearly 9000 spams in a 30 day period, which works out to an average of 300 spams a day. Personally, that means about 60% of my email is spam, a far lower percentage of spam than most people see. I guess being subscribed to ten or so mailing lists had to have some benefit.
Mine is just a single data point, compared to the millions some anti-spam vendors get to see. But I like having a personal high water mark to compare to what the vendors are reporting. I’m not a spam expert, so it’s interesting to see new spam subjects that companies like F-secure report. Anyone else out there keep track of the spam they receive for fun?
Technorati Tags: security, spam, McKeay
Jun
09
2006
What an evil, sneaky, underhanded way to social engineer a business! I like it! This company took twenty USB thumb drives, seeded them liberally with malware and pictures, and left them on the ground outside the credit union they were targeting. People fell for it, and quite frankly I can’t say I blame them. If I found a thumb drive laying around in the parking lot, I’d probably plug it into a system to see who it belonged to myself. Or at least I would have before I read this article.
This was done as part of a penatration test, with the full approval of the company that was attacked. But is it really safe for anyone to assume that the any media you find laying around was lost, not placed there on purpose? This really would be a good way to target almost any company you might want to mention. It’s so much safer to always assume a malicious intent and take the proper precautions than it is to assume innocence. This is why I always get so angry when businesses talk about stolen laptops and the thieves not knowing what they have. You have to assume malicious intent and prove that none exists, not the other way around.
Technorati Tags: security, USB drive, social engineering